| The old dude has been abstaining from sex as long as he's been celibate (so he says), and has no sense of reality on the ground, and uses his influence to discourage the use of condoms on the grounds that there are 'better solutions', which are wholly unrealistic in practice, but suit his agenda. If you don't play the game don't mess with the rules. The reality is: people will have sex, both inside and outside of their relationships. 'Marital Fidelity' as a concept is great, but it is about as mythical as the tooth fairy, contrary to popular belief. http://www.truthaboutdeception.com/cheating-and-infidelity/s... The reality is: once a virus is present in a population it will spread, even if you are 'careful', for one because even if you are monogamous your partner that you are sure is too may not be, and they have possibly (make that probably) slept with others in the past. To willfully ignore the reality on the ground is stupid at best and criminal at worst. In some countries in Africa there is a 20%+ rate of sero-positivity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_a... The scientists view is to state the 'optimum' solution, to realize that reality is different and to hold up condom use as the second best solution. Taking it out of context like that is simply silly. |