Could someone explain the hate for affiliate links? Maybe I'm just being naive, but as long as there's no suspicion of ratings bias, I'm fine with them.
Ex: I've used thewirecutter.com recommendations for home supplies--and I'm happy to give the creators a kickback for their effort (at no cost to me).
> Could someone explain the hate for affiliate links? Maybe I'm just being naive, but as long as there's no suspicion of ratings bias, I'm fine with them.
> Ex: I've used thewirecutter.com recommendations for home supplies--and I'm happy to give the creators a kickback for their effort (at no cost to me).
Wirecutter is an example of affiliate links working well. The site itself adds value by providing deep reviews of each product set and presents options, even at different price points.
The vast majority of sites that include affiliate links are nothing more than listicles with the bare min amount of content to get included in search engine indexes.
They're also notorious for not being maintained so whatever the "best, more curated, bespoke, ..." content was of 201X becomes the only recommendation ever presented.
Judging by the rest of the comments in this discussion, there are some very notable oversights missing from this list. It's not unlikely that is caused by a lack of referral program from those providers.
There may be notable services missing, but I wouldn't say it is an oversight. It seems the most popular or well-known services are covered and not all of them have referral links. Sure, there is room for improvement, but it seems to me that the creator put this together in good faith.
When there is money involved you have to question if the difference in revenue is biasing the review, or the choice of products to consider in the review.
It misaligns incentives. This comment thread is full of people pointing out popular services that haven't been included. The reason they haven't been included is because they don't have affiliate programs.
I don't know how this can be presented as 'a curated list of best tools' when it simply isn't
This isn't unbiased content, it's an advertorial - a blatant one, at that - and for that reason it doesn't really belong here.
The other 3/4 websites don't have the affiliation programs ;)
But jokes aside, as I tried to explain on the FAQ website, I'm not related with any of the companies and tried to choose them honestly, based on the quality of the service they offer. If they have affiliation links, I have add them. If not, it doesn't matter.
There are many great services like Amazon, Heroku or all of the errors tracking tools, that don't have affiliation links and they are there because their service is great, so I'm not trying to trick people to use the other tools because that will give me money (also, none of the affiliation links give you real money, usually those are some credits on each platform, and if, for example an affiliation link can help me host the this website for free for couple of months, then why not).
> The other 3/4 websites don't have the affiliation programs ;)
My comment was half meant as a jest at exactly that. If they existed, I'm sure they'd be included as well.
> But jokes aside, as I tried to explain on the FAQ website, I'm not related with any of the companies and tried to choose them honestly, based on the quality of the service they offer. If they have affiliation links, I have add them. If not, it doesn't matter. There are many great services like Amazon, Heroku or all of the errors tracking tools, that don't have affiliation links and they are there because their service is great, so I'm not trying to trick people to use the other tools because that will give me money [truncated ...]
Oh come on. We all know you created the site specifically to plant affiliate links. There's no shame in admitting it.
> [... truncated] (also, none of the affiliation links give you real money, usually those are some credits on each platform, and if, for example an affiliation link can help me host the this website for free for couple of months, then why not).
You can host this website for free, permanently, as a static site on GitHub pages.
Saying you can use the money to pay for hosting the site "free for couple of months" shows you know even less about what's available than I already thought.
Ex: I've used thewirecutter.com recommendations for home supplies--and I'm happy to give the creators a kickback for their effort (at no cost to me).