[krzyk]

Some countries allow such content, so Google shouldn't remove it from results in such countries.

E.g. in Poland if you have bought a copy of given software, you can download if also from the site and use whichever version you prefer (but only one) - this is a fare use case.

Example would be if given software is in a poor way DRM protected and you would like to run it on an OS that doesn't support DRM.

Or in the days of games distributed on CDs, we were downloading those pirated versions (while owning a proper one) because they didn't require a CD to be always in the computer.

[no_wizard]

Perhaps. They are making blanket filters because its going to mostly apply in most countries google does business in.

You could argue that they should apply it to a country by country specifics, sure. Though i fail to see how its google's problem if you can or can't find a website per se. They are, yes a search engine, and that is what google.com's primary purpose of use is. What they aren't saying, nor have they really ever guaranteed, is that they will give you unfiltered results. Its actually quite the contrary. It's google's indexing and filter algorithms that make it so effective in the first place.

With all that said, there is always an alternative. Google's a private company. They can't shut down these websites. They aren't even attempting to do that. They are just making casual access more complicated I suppose more than anything.

Its within their right to do that.

(Notice how no one seems to be scoffing at Bing, its all about what Google does or doesn't do)