|
|
|
|
|
by Strom
3408 days ago
|
|
The thing is, anyone with a 144 Hz monitor [1] knows from experience that what you're claiming here is complete bullshit. Then there's also the fact that 70 Hz causes demonstrably more nausea in VR users than 90 Hz or more. Beyond that, if you wanna act innocent and play a citation game, I can throw you a bone. I'll give you this [2], what do you give me in return? -- [1] This was already evident back in CRT days when 70 Hz was garbage and 100+ Hz was what every serious gamer was after. [2] http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm |
|
How about the NIH? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2826883/figure/...
Gap detection thresholds for different age ranges. Notice that the average for vision is around 20ms, or 50fps. Yeah some people are lower but the large majority of people don't see any faster than 60fps
[1] so its not actually a citation it's just annoying.