[vacri]

The internet is very bad at providing clear, concise, and readable information, all without flashing ads at the user. Wikipedia is good at that bit. Britannica is, oddly, not good at that - it's a visually busy site and it's slow to navigate around.

Also, the "Britannica is more accurate than Wikipedia" comment is a canard, and has been proven wrong in the past. Google 'wikipedia britannica errors' and you'll find a number of study results that have one or the other slightly ahead, or rate them similarly. It's just not true that Britannica is more accurate than Wikipedia, not to any notable degree.