[aashishkoirala]

Somehow I was expecting a longer account of things with more instances than "we hired this guy in Taipei, and he didn't like working remotely" - did I miss something?

[jessep]

Yeah, he starts of saying they have over 40 people, then says one of them tried working remotely and didn't keep it up. Seems misleading.

[TheCoelacanth]

And they also still have two people working remotely. I guess "Our company's remote work system worked for some people but not for others" doesn't make for a very good headline.

[yoz-y]

It almost looks like there is half of the article missing in the middle.

[Splendor]

Same here. I kept re-reading trying to find the part I missed where they explain what they actually tried.