[kordless]

> Not trying to demoralize them

My observation indicates nobody is saying otherwise, which would normally beg the question "why are you saying this?" if someone didn't know any better. In this case, however, I think why you are saying it is actually based on inverse trust hacking.

Personally, I don't care about hearing about how using anti-trust got another anti-trust implementation success. Anti-trust doesn't scale, and the gains to be had by anti-trust imply suffering for many and only a small chance of reduced suffering for the wielder of it.

HN: This story represents blame and anti-trust. Report it least it spread further.