| The persons in favor of Vulkan in this thread don't have to prove their point, you have. Their solution works, is battle tested, is cross platform and almost an industry standard. Unless you backup the Apple proposal with serious evidences such as : - hard metrics on performance benefits, why you need them, and why you can't improve vulkan to get them; - demonstration of blatant issues with the vulkan API and very good solution you can implement and why you can't improve vulkan to get them; - strong evaluation of the benefits your solution provide given the cost it would have compared to adopting vulkan. Then you have no credibility. "Let's fix something that works" is rarely welcomed in programming. Coming from a company that is well known for disrespecting the rest of the world by creating their own island of closed standards and help noone pass the border, it's even worst. On this one, you are guilty until proven innocent, I'm sorry. |
Or rather, he's got to refute the null hypothesis.