[alokyadav15]

What about 1948,1986,1992,2013... Riots , why always whining about Gujrat or you think that only in gujrat riots politicians were involved ?

[helloindia]

With your logic, since politicians are always involved in Riots, it's ok that Modi was also involved in Gujarat Riots?

[alokyadav15]

of course not , I mentioned those riots because biased view of andrewvijay , where riots means gujrat and criminal means modi.

[andrewvijay]

They are not the prime ministers now. The context that we are talking here is about the current govt. If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay. Get your priorities straight.

[alokyadav15]

> If the previous govts had lots of wrong doers then it doesnt mean the current govt doing the same is okay .

Supreme court of India gave clean chit to Modi [0]. second here context is Indian Politicians not current Indian govt.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Narendra-Modi-gets-...

[rameshdsouza]

Using the same argument - we shouldn't discredit those crimes and criminals just because they are not prime ministers or chief ministers now. Get your priorities right.