[sebyddd]

Appreciate your point of view. First of all, there seems to be a lot of skepticism around this project and I found that surprising. You're saying that if you would get incredible returns from trading you would keep quiet. And therefore you are contradicting yourself by accusing my lack of transparency.

As I was invited to share my story on Indie Hackers, my goal was to provide as much insights into the project, without blowing up the advantage it gives me over a very niche market (NSE). I have absolutely no intention to 'advertise my freelancer business' or 'sell my tech', as someone mentioned. My goal was strictly to send an encouragement message to people thinking of/building something similar, by sharing as much as I can of my project. Faking stories online would be the last thing on my agenda and I find it somehow amusing that some people believe that.

PS: Having to cat a lot of text + csv files while developing this, it was much easier to alias my cat function to use csvtool on csv files and it's regular implementation on other files

PS2: The 'minimalist, ultra-stylish AWS window' is a quick app I cranked in a few hours to see the status of my instances. Not sure what's suspicious here. The window or the the fact that it's stylish?

[frgtpsswrdlame]

>Appreciate your point of view. First of all, there seems to be a lot of skepticism around this project and I found that surprising.

Really? You made a crazy claim with no details at all.

Here's my assumptions on this thing:

1. Your algorithmic strategy is only performed on a small selection of stocks, that you have semi-randomly picked, aka not a part of your system.

2. These stocks have had a crazy run.

3. When the NSE had troubles in Nov. and Dec. your conservative stop losses triggered and you stayed out of the market.

4. Your decision on when to re-enter the market was a personal decision, not a part of your system.

5. You have given this thing more money to invest with than we are being led to believe.

Which ones did I miss on?

I gotta be honest, it really does seem like a nice little way to plug you business but I don't believe you're lying. I think you're overstating its performance by leaving out details and were lucky to get that performance in the first place.

[svantana]

From the article: >> Got a cool project? I am currently available for freelance work.

Whether you are lying or not does not really matter, after all you're just a regular guy trying to get ahead like the rest of us. And the startup royalty keeps telling us to bend the rules. What I'm criticising is IndieHacker's lack of due diligence to screen for charlatans. I'm assuming you didn't show them any further proof than what's in the article?

[fictioncircle]

> Appreciate your point of view. First of all, there seems to be a lot of skepticism around this project and I found that surprising. You're saying that if you would get incredible returns from trading you would keep quiet. And therefore you are contradicting yourself by accusing my lack of transparency.

https://www.quantopian.com/open

Easy $5k if it does what you claim and would settle the dispute. You can just feed them trades w/o revealing the actual algo.

[alva]

Post your current and historic positions, opened and closed and people might believe you. Currently you have offered absolutely no proof of your claims and the interview suggests you are extremely naive of trading.