|
|
|
|
|
by the8472
3420 days ago
|
|
> Trying to fight a local attacker with root (which is necessary to add a certificate to the trust stores on most platforms) isn't worth the effort. Hah. That's precisely the argument I have made when arguing that there should be an opt-out for addon signature verification (needing admin permissions to toggle it if they insist) because you already utterly lost the security game if someone had admin on the machine. But no, they argue that they must defend against malware with admin permissions injecting addons into the browser. Because that's a fight worth fighting and the perception of the browser's security is somehow more important than user freedom. |
|
My first instinct is to say "it's important to not install crap software, you need to reasonably trust the software you install". But I immediately recognize that it's un-intuitive that Adobe and Microsoft and Symantec and McAfee are not on the "trusted" list. (Office and .Net have silently installed problematic Firefox extensions in the past.)
I don't really have a conclusion here, just, it sucks.