Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dagss 3423 days ago
How on earth do you define "win"?

How exactly can you "decimate" someone in nuclear capability? The earth can only be destroyed (for purposes of supporting human life) once. US being able to destroy it five times over and China once doesn't really help in real life. It is not like you can trade one US nuke 1:1 to stop one China nuke.

1 comments

>How exactly can you "decimate" someone in nuclear capability?

That's easy: you destroy 1/10 of their forces.

If you mean anything else by using the term "decimate", you're using it wrong.

This is pedantic, pointless and wrong.
Pedantic, perhaps. Wrong? Definitely not. Look it up. "Decimation" was a term invented by the Romans, and was a method of punishing Army units who failed in battle. All the men would line up, and every 10th man would be executed. That's why it's called "decimation": "deci" is Latin for 10.

Modern uses of the word are simply wrong and nonsensical if you understand that "deci" means 10, which should be obvious to any competent English speaker who knows of the word "decimal" and understands our numbering system.

The meaning of words changes over time. The meaning of decimate has changed from its original meaning. Sorry you can't handle that fact.

Oh, and that is not to mention that the original meaning of "decimate" was "tithe," not "kill on in ten soldiers."

> Sorry you can't handle that fact.

I like how buddy proves to you he's right, and you have the gall to act like you're right.

Besides, this argument is over pedantics. My original comment stands. China is weak compared to US. No war necessary, restructuring in favour of US WILL TAKE PLACE.

Wrong. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimation_%28Roman_army%29:

"The word decimation is derived from Latin meaning "removal of a tenth"."

Did you look it up before saying "look it up"?
No, but Wikipedia backs me up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimation_%28Roman_army%29

The only other entries in the disambiguation page are about signal processing and a comic book.

Linguistic prescriptivism is pedantic and wrong.