[aao]

It's a rant about PR bullshit, specifically this:

>Windows is the only platform with a customer commitment to investigate reported security issues and proactively update impacted devices as soon as possible,

EDIT and this

>The time has come for Microsoft vulnerability disclosure communications to mute the marketers and let the security engineers do the talking instead.

I found it funny to be honest

[mjw1007]

In this case it seems to have been fully-fledged lying, not just bullshit: Microsoft (told the researcher they) delayed releasing this patch so they could release a number of SMB-related fixes at once.

They might have good reasons for doing that, but it isn't true to say they "proactively update impacted devices as soon as possible".

[golfer]

Microsoft always seems to prefer going on offense rather than playing defense. They are one of the least self-aware companies I can think of. For example, this absolutely insane "funeral march" for iPhone and Blackberry they held in 2010 to celebrate the launch of Windows Phone 7 [1]. What other company would even consider this?

[1] https://www.engadget.com/2010/09/10/microsoft-celebrates-win...

[PhantomGremlin]

They are one of the least self-aware companies I can think of.

That was Uncle Fester's Microsoft. That behavior was an extension of Ballmer's pugilistic personality.

Today's Microsoft is just as tone-deaf, but in a different respect. For the life of me I can't understand why Nadella thinks that their recent behavior wrt. Win 10 is a good idea. E.g. rebooting user's machines during presentations, having spyware that it's not possible to disable, advertising in the OS, etc.

[baldfat]

I am still shocked that Windows was recoverable from the fiasco of XP security problems. They have gotten exponentially better in security over the years.

[cptskippy]

The NT Kernel is a very secure and resilient design, it was just mucked up over the years with Win32 blurring the lines between the kernel and userland. MinWin was an internal project that started in Windows 7 where the tendrils of things like Win32 were extricated from the kernel. In addition to improving security, this also enabled things like multi-platform support and headless servers.

[PhantomGremlin]

I understand what you're saying "in theory".

But in practice, here's what happened. In 2002 Chairman Bill said:

   An internal Microsoft e-mail tells the software
   giant's employees that security and privacy are
   the most important issues for the company's products.

https://www.cnet.com/news/gates-security-is-top-priority/

And yet, 15 years later, we're discussing yet another 0day. And Win 10's built in spyware is the absolute opposite of "privacy".

I'd rather judge Microsoft on their actual historical record, and not on whether Cutler's initial design for NT was secure and resilient.