| > The labor is not cheap. I have already explained this. Is this: >> 60k is NOT CHEAP LABOR in most parts of the country! You "explanation"? Because you didn't really respond to: >> But if it is not cheap and is a decent salary, there should be no problem filling it with American laborers. >> If there are such cases, I posit $130k is a low end start for their salaries. Or to: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13553710 > I have already explained this. You haven't replied to all responses to those explanations (e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13552944 ), and I haven't accepted some of your arguments yet. Can you point out which posts of your own you are referring to? > The only reason I am replying is.. If you are going to take this arrogant tone, then take your own posts less authoritatively. It's not "open-minded" to lace your responses with such haughty barbs. |