Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ChuckMcM 3426 days ago
In this case, and others like it, a clean room is challenging because a principal (in this case Carmack) left one company and joined another. So the 'taint' if you will is in his head.
1 comments

If so, then I see two possibilities here:

1) The IP in question was only reimplementable with Carmack involved, and the lawsuit was basically inevitable. Hiring Carmack in this scenario is reasonably perceived as an end-run around buying/licensing the IP itself.

2) The IP could be reproduced clean room without Carmack involved. Lawsuit is easily headed off.