|
|
|
|
|
by mildbow
3427 days ago
|
|
I have no horse in the race, but this response feels a lot like you handling the situation vs actually caring about being unfair to developers. Once you do get the new version of the contract, I suggest you read it from a random developers point to view. Maybe even have a "Show HN". Aim for reasonably unrestrictive? Because of this blunder, you now have more to prove! You wont have much of a marketplace if developers don't feel valued. Why is a FAQ about your contract required? Isn't the contract the canonical agreement? Are you, in case of legal trouble, going to refer to both the FAQ and/or the contract? Seems a bit weird to me. ps: I've found "standard" contracts are what everyone says when talking about their own contracts. |
|