|
|
|
|
|
by elvinyung
3430 days ago
|
|
Please forgive me, but I don't understand your hostility. I understand that there are perfectly legitimate reasons for using a database as a queue. If you frequently need to look at and rearrange your jobs while they're in flight, chances are a pure FIFO structure probably doesn't work that well for you anyways. If the enqueue is contingent on a transaction committing, probably makes a lot of sense for the job to be in the same database. You don't need to tell me -- I've seen more than a few in production. But an actual message queue also "works perfectly fine" based on the information provided, and I would imagine that a company like Facebook probably already has a few of those lying around. It would have been a conscious choice to use MySQL as a queue. I swear I'm actually, seriously just curious! |
|