[avatar345]

It seems clear to me that by not supporting the strike, Uber avoided choosing sides, which among Tech companies is as if it explicitly came out and supported Trump's executive order.

However, I don't understand how the strike was intended to help the victims, or change policy. A strike is meant to inconvenience a group of decision makers. If a company won't pay fair wages, the the employees stop performing work. Then the company cannot make profit and must find scabs, or give in. If university officials implement unfair or corrupt policies, then students occupy the decision makers' offices.

However, it seems like this strike was meant to inconvenience no one related to the problem. Perhaps someone can comment on what I'm missing.