Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by SixSigma 3422 days ago
An hour of labour is, for all intents and purposes, also free or 200 kcals of food at the most.
3 comments

Not really. The cost of skilled labor is related to the amount of experience and training required to be able to perform that labor as well as the supply/demand for that labor. Unless all these software engineers pulling down $200/hr consulting are lying?
You've got to pay me more the 200kcals to make me not live my own life for an hour.
Until you have 0kcals available. The surfeit of labour is coming.
The difference is the opportunity cost. It's easy to see what other opportunities labour has, it's not easy to see what other opportunities copying bits has, especially in the household capacity. I certainly don't see anyone asking to use my residential bit-copying facilities in any meaningful capacity, but I do see people asking to use my time.
Additionally: I don't really have an "unused" amount of hours at the end of the day. I definitely have an "unused" amount of bit-copying capacity.
Your download server could be mining bitcoin and all those data centres are not free either.
Is the commodity hardware that people watch Netflix on really going to generate any money mining bitcoins? Or are they just going to rack up an expensive electricity bill?