[_andromeda_]

Like I said, it's a temporary ban to allow the President and his team to figure things such as these out.

It is also an edge case that can be overlooked because there are other routes to get to her desired destination.

She is an Iranian. You and I don't know her. We cannot speak to her credibility. We cannot even speak to the credibility of an actual American who goes to Iran and comes back after a spending some time there let alone hers. How can you know whether she is radicalized unless you're absolutely careful about who comes into your country? These things are happening and cannot be sugarcoated or denied any longer. Something must be done and I for one am glad that Trump is setting such a great example for all other countries.

[matt4077]

You're insane. Could you kindly point out any terrorist acts in the US by any citizen of any of the nationalities now banned?

If you want Trump to "be an example for other countries", how should the woman ever get to Costa Rica, considering Costa Rica <-> Iran is probably not popular enough to warrant a direct flight?

How exactly is a woman that is not allowed to exit the terminal, and has been through three metal detectors a risk to America?

Considering there has been no single incident with any terrorists from the nations in the last 30 years (yeah, I just spoiled the answer for the first question, sorry), would I be expecting too much when asking why nobody thought to pick up the phone and ask immigrations "If I were to ban people from country X, is there anything I should keep in mind". After all, it took DHS less than 6 hours to identify ambiguities with regards to green cards and visas.

[_andromeda_]

No name calling please. I'm very much sane and the furthest thing from a deplorable so to speak.

Please tell me we're not ignoring that most terrorism is Muslim affiliated. That, coupled with the fact that there have been many attacks all over the world by Muslim terrorists leads me to ask a simple question, does it then not make sense to ban people from largely Muslim countries until more can be done to thwart these attacks?

Should nothing be done according to you?

As for that woman, that is an edge case and it can be tolerated for now until travelers on transit can be isolated more carefully in the future. For now, the ban must be employed because more important things are at stake here i.e. security.

>How exactly is a woman that is not allowed to exit the terminal

>If you want Trump to "be an example for other countries", how should the woman ever get to Costa Rica, considering Costa Rica <-> Iran is probably not popular enough to warrant a direct flight?

I would suggest that they be stopped before coming to America in the first place. Let them use another route until authorities can figure out what the hell is going on. America is after all high on extremists' target priority lists.

Don't use this small instance of this woman to discredit the entire ban on these 7 nations' emigrants.

[danso]

> Should nothing be done according to you?

Not sure if you're aware of this but America has a Department of Homeland Security as well as USCIS, both funded to the tune of billions of dollars to provide screening of the immigration process. There is a lot more than "nothing" that has been done to regulate immigration before Trump's executive order.

[_andromeda_]

Clearly whatever is being done is insufficient and that's why there are attacks by Islamists. As such Trump has decided to be more proactive. He needs more support and accolades for being brave enough to do what's needed even though it is controversial.

[danso]

How many people have died in America due to Islamist attacks since 9/11, nevermind immigrant Islamist attacks?

[_andromeda_]

What? Why would you even ask that?

Do you want America to be like France where because of insufficient immigration controls they get an attack every so often from these Islamic immigrants?