|
|
|
|
|
by Buge
3433 days ago
|
|
Very interesting article, and funny in a dark way. But I can't help but compare these guys to this guy[1] who was on the front page of HN 2 weeks ago. He privately disclosed the vulnerability, then waited 12 days then publicly disclosed it on his blog. And there was widespread outrage and condemnation of him for daring to disclose that quickly, putting users at risk. He was described as "a parasite on society". Well if someone who privately discloses then waits 2 weeks and publicly discloses is a parasite, what is someone who sells exploits to oppressive countries that kill journalists? With that comparison, the discloser seems downright virtuous. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13407717 |
|
The standard is something like a minimum of 30 days (usually more) upon confirmation receipt. He never saw someone acknowledge the disclosure, so McDonalds' security staff could justifiably say they were not aware and couldn't have done anything.
Responsible full disclosure, like how Google's Project Zero reports bugs, is the best compromise.