But high volume, it could be in every laptop under $800 price point. A lot of these guys already make low margin high volume products (like Samsung and TVs) and that's okay.
Sigh. There's no reason to be be a condescending prick (ad hominem).
Simply asking somebody who works in the industry why it's impractical to segment the market by making slower chips. Maybe it's not possible or they cost the same, but I'm just speculating. Hence wanting to find out and understand.
> I'm not sure if you understand the economics, but no sane for-profit company will trade margins for high volume.
Business don't always get a choice, or do make that choice (based on game theory). In the case of SSD vendors it's a decently competitive market with many vendors (Samsung, Intel, Toshiba, Sandisk, ...). In fact it looks like Samsung is going this route: https://www.extremetech.com/computing/236260-samsung-plants-... . Which they might as well do because they one of the largest producers so it makes sense to put pressure on your competitors if (if you can sustain it).
I also explained why it can't be high volume - there might not be enough actual low speed chips to make high capacity drives in volume.
I'm not sure if you understand the economics, but no sane for-profit company will trade margins for high volume.