|
|
|
|
|
by q3k
3436 days ago
|
|
I've taken a cursory look at SoftEther a few months ago. It looks like a research project that was then unsuccessfully commercialized, and then released to the public somewhat hastily. The code quality leaves a lot to be desired (there is nothing offensive, but it still does not inspire confidence for there not being security bugs), and the code style is not great either. The amount of marketing copytext is disproportionately large to the amount of code comments and design documentation. It generally seems to go for a everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach in terms of features (which is not a bad thing per se, but an approach that I dislike). The SoftEther repository is 280k lines of C and headers, while OpenVPN is 80k. |
|