|
|
|
|
|
by cmrdporcupine
3432 days ago
|
|
Wow I feel the opposite. Because C++98 and earlier were so deficient in a lot of ways, people who got clever with it often ended up down a rabbit hole of template metaprogramming, boost:: bloat, custom classes for callback stuff, custom classes for reference counting or other smart pointers, etc. etc. Unlearning all that took me some time. In my 5 years at Google, I've watched many developers start from scratch on our subset of modern C++. There doesn't seem to be a huge challenge with it. |
|
https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html
It it is, I consider Google very lucky to have these who decided not to allow everything.