|
|
|
|
|
by John23832
3436 days ago
|
|
> Because we have working models for high performing specialty schools. So just because? >"And how do you define "better"? Is it a lower teacher to student ratio? Higher average test scores? Graduation percentage? Percentage of graduating seniors accepted at 4 year colleges? Some other measure?" There is no "better" for everyone. Rather than just segregating students (and requiring more teachers resources etc.), work to made education better for your students. Have different classes at different speeds. >"I believe that I would have been better off in a separate school.
I have chosen to send my children to a charter school for that reason." That's fine, and that's your prerogative as a parent. However, to say that segregation of kids should be the norm is a dangerous. IMO reckless. |
|
Because we know it can be done and how to do it.
Have different classes at different speeds.
We already have that. Education is more than a series of classes. It's the social interactions too.
However, to say that segregation of kids should be the norm is a dangerous. IMO reckless.
I find it dangerous, reckless and disingenuous for you to use a loaded term like "segregation".