[trombone22]

That his energy plan does not mention the threat of climate change is another fact, that the energy plan does not mention nuclear power, that of two scientists he has met after the election one is well known for his active denial of the central discovery of climate science: these are more facts the article relays.

[return0]

Then the author should be more honest. "We must fight to add nuclear power to trump's plan". That other 'fact' is inconsequential.

[08-15]

> these are more facts the article relays

So it's a bad article, aka a political fluff piece. I got that message from reading it.

But what are these facts?