|
|
|
|
|
|
by mattlevan
3440 days ago
|
|
|
Sad that HN allows obviously hostile comments like these to remain... Anyways, Trump listened to America. He listened quite a bit. He not only visited and spoke to hundreds of thousands of people all over the country, but he held multiple (7 was his max) rallies everyday near the end of his campaign. He also frequently sent long, detailed surveys (with both multiple choice and text box questions) to gauge public opinion. On the contrary, Hillary was the candidate who failed to interact: from the lack of press conferences to lack of media interviews to lack of rallies to lack of presence in many states, Hillary's loss is arguably a direct reflection of her failed engagement with American people. Edit: Here come the down votes. |
|
|
And we have enough data to unequivocally reject the man as well as his rhetoric. Look at his cabinet. Look at his twitter feed. Look at this constant stream of lies. See how unprepared he is. Skate to where the puck is going and see how this ends.
In the time from when he won (by being the biggest losing winner) to when his actions taking office, there is literally no defence of this man.
He might have listened, and he heard exactly what he needed to say to his "marks" (this would be his term from the Art of the Deal) to win and then he got on with his real agenda: making himself and his friends obscenely wealthy at the expense of the rest of America and the world.