Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by salem 3431 days ago
No, they actually did write parts of the paper.

Leaving them out as co-authors would be misconduct.

1 comments

Source?
The paper is about how to iteratively tweak your rendering pipeline to achieve a certain look. It makes sense that the director of the movie would be involved in that process.
If I tell someone to blur a background during postprocessing, do I also get a coauthor credit on a paper about gaussian photo manipulation?
If the particular blur in question has a unique characteristic, you should push for it, sure.
So, you didn't read the paper, huh?
I did. They describe using a Keras implementation, written by someone else, of style transfer, which was invented by someone else, to achieve a particular artistic effect. They use a pre-trained model. They don't even have to buy any hardware, since they used AWS GPU instances. It's a case study, nothing new has been accomplished here.

Do I also get a Verge writeup if I publish a PDF to arxiv about how I compiled and installed tensorflow? The only reason we're talking about this paper is because the name of a Hollywood actress is on it, and because it has the AI buzzword.

Look at the title: "Kristen Stewart co-authors AI paper". 113 points.

The paper itself was submitted earlier, under its actual title, which does not mention Kristen Stewart: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13443107 6 points! The paper is not very interesting. The only thing that makes it newsworthy is the coauthor.

Is any arXiv preprint more untrustworthy than any other or something [I mean, it's not viXra...]?

I can't help but think it would be degrading to have your name on a paper and it be deemed too advanced to be your responsibility..

You could ask the first author directly, I suppose; https://twitter.com/bhautikj

My question was directed at "salem" who stated "No, they actually did write parts of the paper.". That statement seemed like it should have reasoning behind it...
My source?

I would ask what is the source of that quote? The article no longer contains it.