|
|
|
|
|
|
by Dan_JiuJitsu
3435 days ago
|
|
|
So, basically, your argument is that
'People can not be trusted with information that may be nuanced, so instead news outlets should limit themselves to headlines that minimize risk.'
Comparing the use of an app to a lifesaving medicine is, in my view, a gross mis-characterization. The article suggested a more secure alternative that we all agree is more secure. What's the issue? |
|
|