|
|
|
|
|
by PanMan
5889 days ago
|
|
While interesting (and different results than I expected), I would say uptime here is even more important than access times: I'd rather have all my visitors wait 0.04 sec more, than a small percentage not having the page work at all.
Another issue off course is that the files will be cached if your users have visited a site that uses the same CDN. I would guess that the Google CDN is most widespread, and a local cache hit is always faster than a CDN. |
|