[geophile]

If you love technology, the new place offers it, and the old place doesn't, then that alone is a good reason for moving. You aren't causing your vested options to lose value by moving since your current employer sounds like it values marketing and sales more than technology. The only thing keeping you are 1) inertia and 2) the move and remote work. (The hiring probably doesn't compare to the much bigger pool of engineers at the new place.)

Unless the move and remote work are incredibly important to you, it sounds like an easy choice.

(One thing you haven't mentioned is big company vs. startup. Think about that too.)

[timeforchange]

This is what I needed to hear. Thank you for helping to bring me some clarity.

So, the big company vs. startup discussion gets even more interesting. I was hired at big company onto small team to work mainly on greenfield projects. Almost like the best of both worlds.

[geophile]

"Like a startup inside a big company" seems dubious. I have heard it so many times through the years, and it just never pans out. It is basically a euphemism for: you will start with a blank piece of paper and work very hard in a small team. But you will still be subject to big company policies, and of course you don't get anything like startup equity in case your project succeeds in the marketplace. So not literally the best of both worlds.

I'm not saying not to join such a team -- just that you should go into it with a clear picture. It sounds like this could well scratch your techie itch, and seems better than your current position. However, if the chance of a big payoff is important to you, I am dubious.