No, we wouldn't. We might get a debate about whether programming such a feature is misogynist (which it pretty much is), but I can't exactly imagine the debate would be centered around an AI doing what it's programmed to do.
I'm not saying it isn't a valid debate, I'm saying in this instance the premise is already misogynistic before a single line of code is written, so the debate doesn't apply here.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/26/opinion/sunday/artificial...
https://www.propublica.org/article/breaking-the-black-box-ho...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/09/19/amazon-echo...