[kasabali]

Yet another systemd post which

- Handwaves real criticisms and instead tries to look like an objective writing by presenting a trivial issue

- Have no idea about advances in sysvinit in the last decade that allowed support for parallel boot and dependency relations (and which was supported natively on mainstream distribution)

- Totally ignores the other "modern" and widely used init system and instead compares systemd with sysvinit of 80's (which wasn't used by any mainstream distro in that form)

- Overrates process supervision features which were already as equally as easy to use with supervision suites like runit (IMHO even easier)

Meh, what did I expect? Bandwagon is going full speed.