|
|
|
|
|
by Locke1689
3439 days ago
|
|
I wouldn't say that's what most people mean by parallel, but in that case I think you're better off building a layer on top of the compiler for that. For instance, provided deterministic compilation you could keep a networked cache of compiled libraries that would be delivered as needed. Trying to be network-parallel at any finer level is probably a waste of time -- network and (de)serialization overhead would eat away all the advantages. |
|