Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by brianwawok 3447 days ago
Considering every single TV spot is selling us things to make us Fat or die sooner, I would not want to take the otherside of the bet against people getting sick.

Americans, we are all about freedom. Freedom to kill ourselves and eat twinkies. But we expect help when we are sick.

One side or the other has to budge a little. Do we give up being able to get the same insurance despite unhealthy habbits? Do we give up helping the poor and the sick?

1 comments

This is why we need fact based research to understand these costs, and use a direct tax on those items to recoup those costs from those who engage in those risks.

Go skiing? Well there's a higher tax for the ticket because you have X% higher risk of breaking a leg. Twinkies right now are a grocery food so in fact it has less tax, where it probably should be taxed like booze or cigarettes (in effect a sin tax). Of course sin taxes get abused, where the money goes to the general fund rather than going to mitigation for the undesirable behavior.

Then what happens to diet soda? Likely not good for you but no calories. Tax free or same tax as normal cola?

I think for most things we are too stupid to really calculate the extranalaties of products.