It's called proof by contradiction. I thought it was self evident that Kim Jong-un wouldn't listen to reason once he had nukes, but perhaps you know better.
First: In case you felt that way, I did not write this to criticize you. I'm not saying you're wrong or you're trying to manipulate people. I'm highlighting the persuasion tactic you used.
>I thought it was self evident that Kim Jong-un wouldn't listen to reason once he had nukes, but perhaps you know better.
Thing is, I don't know better! Tell me how you know better.
And "self-evident" is really code for "everyone knows..."
If I said "Sure, I think he can listen to reason just like all the other nuclear leaders", what is your response?
Well, I can really only go on by what I read in the press. All that killing he's doing to squash dissent. Doesn't sounds like spends much time listening to any rational argument beyond he who can kill people makes the rules.
And, to be fair, that argument seems to work for a lot of people (looking at you, Putin, Assad, etc).
>I thought it was self evident that Kim Jong-un wouldn't listen to reason once he had nukes, but perhaps you know better.
Thing is, I don't know better! Tell me how you know better.
And "self-evident" is really code for "everyone knows..."
If I said "Sure, I think he can listen to reason just like all the other nuclear leaders", what is your response?