|
|
|
|
|
by MoSal
3444 days ago
|
|
> in practice the closure syntax and logical or do not lead to confusion (imho, ymmv). That's true. But put your self in the mind of a C developer looking at Rust code for the first time: if a || b {
println!("True");
}
Cool.Then: thread::spawn(|| println!("Hello from a thread!"););
What? What is the logical or doing there?---- IIRC, there are also cases where you have to write `& &`
instead of `&&` to not confuse the compiler. That's
a design/practical issue. Both those issues would have been avoided if literal `and`/`or` were used. I find it interesting how the only thing that momentarily confused me, as a C developer, about Rust syntax, was caused by Rust authors not wanting to syntactically deviate too much from C. |
|