Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by LaurentVB 3453 days ago
Cloudflare redacted the name of the Agent, but left their signature. That's a very literal (and maybe risky?) reading of their obligations.
3 comments

The letter states explicitly that it is requested, but not required, that they redact the name and phone number of the agent.
I thought the same, but was it intentional or rather just oversight?
Risky or not, I make a very "in-your-face" reading of Cloudflare's attitude. This little detail speaks loudest in the whole story, I think.
And what is the benefit of being 'in your face'?
I didn't mean to imply any benefit.