|
|
|
|
|
by flomo
3447 days ago
|
|
He is inserting his own bias without considering the obvious: Infrastructure doesn't vote. It doesn't really matter where you are, politics state that money is going mostly to people and not into the ground. San Francisco, where I live, has loads of revenue and a citizenry which approves every single bond measure on the ballot. And we certainly shouldn't be on his list. Infrastructure issues here are never addressed until they hit a crisis level. Just the other day there was news about how our seawall which contains our entire financial district is in horrible condition[1], and there's "no funding" and the usual blarble about the Feds bailing us out. Is any other city program going to be cut a dime to fix the seawall? No. From a political standpoint it makes more sense to let the city flood than it does to cut off any short-term political gain. [1]https://www.hoodline.com/2017/01/as-earthquake-threat-to-sea... |
|