|
|
|
|
|
by aalireza
3454 days ago
|
|
What you're saying implies that a situation is -even- theoretically possible such that a radically new mathematical theory with near-completely novel underlying frameworks that's essentially developed by a single guy over the span of almost a decade that necessarily resulted in a deviation from the route focused by the majority of researchers, could be `quickly` understood/vetted by other mathematicians via traditional methods of un-automated peer-review process. I guess if that was true, we would have been a significantly smarter species, or at a the very least, had god-like context-switching or learning abilities. |
|
Things might have gone faster if the author had taken the time to teach others and help them understand it.