[pyrale]

Anar-caps have always been separated from anarchists. I don't know why they took this name -they were in quite an identity crisis about it [1]-. A better name could be stateless capitalists.

[1] Murray Rothbard, "Are libertarian anarchists" : https://mises.org/library/are-libertarians-anarchists

[em3rgent0rdr]

Actually anarcho-capitalism permits anarcho-communist, anarcho-syndicalist, and mutualist enclaves (in addition to any voluntary organization) within of a polycentric legal order. It is the most inclusive variety of anarchism.

[pyrale]

Anar-caps permit any other form of anarchism - provided you own land.

Statism permits any other form of government - provided you pay taxes and respect the law.

[em3rgent0rdr]

Under US form of government, it is not permitted to have multiple overlapping anarchist legal orders, unless the system was radically reformed.

[em3rgent0rdr]

You don't actually have to own the land...You could rent the land or hold the land as a collective.

[pyrale]

Yeah, if someone is willing to enter a contract with you, which they are free to decline.

Anyhow, beyond the mere principle of having to be part of a system you reject, it is quite weird to say that any anarchist could live in an anar-cap utopia, when there are such differences between them ; just like it would be weird to say that any anarchy can fully develop as a community within a statist society.