|
|
|
|
|
by samuell
3446 days ago
|
|
Indeed, not only for education, but also as a tool to evaluate tools for various use cases, I think. Have been thinking the same and looked hard for anything like a set of evaluation workflows, incorporating various specific "motifs" if you like (such as nested parameter sweeps). Unfortunately haven't found anything, so for our use cases in bioinformatics, I basically took an example workflow that was used in a course in next-gen sequencing analysis as a starting point: https://github.com/NBISweden/workflow-tools-evaluation/tree/... Only partly implemented it in Common Workflow Language [1] and SciPipe [2] so far ... the implementation turned out to take a tremendous of work :P Much interested if anyone has found / created a more general such set of example workflows. [1] http://commonwl.org [2] https://github.com/scipipe/scipipe |
|