|
|
|
|
|
by upofadown
3456 days ago
|
|
One way to look at this is that Apple used a broken patent system to achieve an unfair result. There is no way an arbitrary assortment of resistances should be patentable. The fact that someone else could potentially do a bad thing does not absolve you of the responsibility for doing that bad thing. |
|
Indeed. Which is why they didn't patent an "arbitrary assortment of resistances", but a technique that so happens to include one.