|
|
|
|
|
|
by akhilcacharya
3455 days ago
|
|
|
> were trying to throw the election to Trump (rather than just to sow chaos). It could be argued that both of those are the same. I doubt they would be reckless enough to gamble on the former to be honest, when almost everybody thought HRC had it in the bag. |
|
|
I'm not sure how it would look any different if they did.
>when almost everybody thought HRC had it in the bag.
Wouldn't that be the only reason to try throwing it to him? If he had it in the bag, it would be unneccessary, right?