|
|
|
|
|
by snrplfth
3457 days ago
|
|
>"huge mess of transporting, storing, unpacking, preparing and disposing of food in all sorts of random ways at various times throughout the flight by the hundreds of hungry sleep deprived passengers." That's generally handled by having a cart with a garbage bag attached that comes by, and having people opening their food on the small trays provided. >"Airports would be even less efficient going through security, vendors trying to sell food to go and people congregating to buy things." Yes. It is called a "post-security food court". >"I would definitely pay more if even more things was standardized and included for everyone on the flight (like luggage, security, airport seating)." That's nice for you. A lot of people don't want that, or aren't willing to pay. |
|
Considerable effort has already gone into making food service efficient. One of the few reason I can imagine to unbundle food is to have fewer flight attendants. But now you're suggesting they should service the passengers in a random rather than sequential order, as not everyone would want to eat at the same time. A tray doesn't really solve the problem of the person shaking their protein drink (which hopefully stays in it's container), the person having to grab the third thing from the over head storage nor someone spilling their to go coffee over you. Food service is efficient. It comes in bulk, everyone gets served, everyone eats, everyone throws things away, done.
> Yes. It is called a "post-security food court".
"Amenities" like food courts and shops is a big reason why airports are annoying. If it wasn't for trying to get you to buy overpriced things airport entry would be as efficient as airport exit and not some IKEA style maze.