|
|
|
|
|
|
by gus_massa
3454 days ago
|
|
|
> You sound very negative towards conducting more experiments on this, when the results have been unexpected every time it's been tested. This is wrong. There is a strong selection bias, where a many team tried this and only those that got a "successful" measurement get press. It's very difficult to get the list of all the unsuccessful (unpublished) experiments, but someone recollected a list em-drive test http://emdrive.wiki/Experimental_Results The important column is the last one. More than 1 means that if it's correct the device is breaking the current laws of physics. Anyway, I count 5 zeros in that list. [And I think that the other are experimental errors.] |
|
|