[ncallaway]

> All I said was no evidence has been made public by the government

Except that's _explicitly_ not what you said. You said:

>still no public evidence that Russia leaked the DNC and Podesta's e-mails?

Your original claim was that there was _no public evidence_. When that claim was challenged, you pretended your claim was about what evidence was provided by the government.

[rahrahrah]

Sorry, my intention wasn't to move the goalposts, I actually misspoke the second time. Obviously I don't care where the evidence comes from. I did mean "no public evidence" and then the parent made it political, somehow.

I did read the RPT-APT28 report by FireEye on APT28 (all fifty-something pages, surprise!). It did convince me that APT28 has political motivations. What's the connection between that and DNC/Podesta? I don't know, because there's no public evidence on that (that I know of).