[pw0ncakes]

Actually, a much worse con, if you want to have this discussion, is that millions of private-sector corporate employees are getting paid peanuts for their work, compensated largely with a promise of future prosperity/advancement that will never come through. A much worse con is that the economic growth since 1975 has been siphoned off almost entirely by the increasingly entrenched upper classes, with consumer debt, a housing bubble, and student-loan debt bondage replacing wage increases to fuel the growth. A much worse con is an economy now plagued by individual insolvency and a widespread lack of trust, resulting from these catastrophic social changes.

Do you really think that it's of benefit to society for some people to show up to work every day and take home Wal-Mart wages, instead of having real alternatives?

A large share of this government waste goes to military contractors employed in completely unnecessary wars such as the multi-trillion-dollar mess in Iraq.

Also, please cite your "on average double" statistic. If my memory serves me, the discrepancy is about 30% on average, mainly because private-sector pay is far more recession-sensitive. (The discrepancy would shrink, if not reverse, in a growing economy with a healthy private sector.) For the record, low-level government employees do make more while upper-level people make considerably less than they do in the private sector.

[inferno0069]

> Do you really think that it's of benefit to society for some people to show up to work every day and take home Wal-Mart wages, instead of having real alternatives?

Given the prevalence of unemployment, yes Walmart jobs are better than at least one real alternative.

[pw0ncakes]

I would rather have a society where people are paid unemployment, even indefinitely, than one where they work under Wal-Mart conditions for Wal-Mart wages-- a circumstance that would be considered slavery by most societies dating back to ancient Greece, although we're afraid to admit that this arrangement is such today.