[throw2016]

Just wondering. Your first comment on this thread claimed the warrant was looking for child porn which was immediately corrected in the reply suggesting you only have a passing acquaintance to the case.

Now in this reply you seem to know much more about the case so why make the false accusation about child porn in the first comment?

[lmm]

I followed the case in detail at the time (back in 2014) but haven't read about it since then. I must have misremembered the child porn aspect (my memory was vague enough that I did say "IIRC", for whatever that's worth). I don't know what you want me to say other than "human memory is fallible".