[rl3]

>Sir, ...

You may want to take a quick gander at the profile of whom you're replying to. :)

>... itching to give Rust a ride once it stabilizes just a bit more ...

Likewise, though from my limited research it seems Rust has legacy baggage of its own already, and there's difficulty in coming to a consensus on what qualifies as idiomatic Rust. It seems that the same principle of cherry-picking a subset of features would apply just the same to Rust as it does to C++. The latter being far messier, of course.

[echelon]

> it seems Rust has legacy baggage of its own already

What is considered legacy cruft in Rust? The only change I'm aware of was the introduction of the `?` operator to replace the `try!` macro. That's easy to find/replace.

[rl3]

The notion extends to official libraries, not just the language itself. That said, I'm not the best person to ask, but cursory research turns up a few examples.[0][1][2][3]

Some of these aren't examples of legacy cruft per se. However, as complexity is added to a language at a rapid rate, there becomes more confusion over what best practice actually is.

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/2r7ttq/where_to_find_...

[1] https://users.rust-lang.org/t/rust-version-support-in-librar...

[2] https://gist.github.com/lifthrasiir/cedb5db8dbcd209c5957

[3] https://users.rust-lang.org/t/is-this-idiomatic-rust/2155

[koja86]

Thank you in both cases sir/madam/whatever :-)

[adelarsq]

Some things still are on nightly builds, so will take some time to be perfect, at least for me. I have plans to use in production on next months =)